Jonas Schuett

Downstream developers - actors who fine-tune or otherwise modify foundational models - can create or amplify risks from foundation models by improving their capabilities or compromising safety features...

Frontier artificial intelligence (AI) systems pose increasing risks to society, making it essential for developers to provide assurances about their safety. One approach to offering such assurances is through a safety case...

As frontier artificial intelligence (AI) systems become more capable, it becomes more important that developers can explain why their systems are sufficiently safe. One way to do so is via safety cases: reports that...

Over the past year, artificial intelligence (AI) companies have been increasingly adopting AI safety frameworks. These frameworks outline how companies intend to keep the potential risks associated with developing and deploying...

Several jurisdictions are starting to regulate frontier artificial intelligence (AI) systems, i.e. general-purpose AI systems that match or exceed the capabilities present in the most advanced systems. To reduce risks...

Frontier artificial intelligence (AI) systems could pose increasing risks to public safety and security. But what level of risk is acceptable? One increasingly popular approach is to...

We welcome the opportunity to respond to the Request for Information (RFI) Related to NIST’s Assignments Under Sections 4.1, 4.5 and 11 of the Executive Order Concerning AI. We offer the following submission for your...

Previous research has pointed towards auditing as a promising governance mechanism to help ensure that AI systems are designed and deployed in ways that are ethical, legal, and technically robust. However, existing auditing...

Organizations that develop and deploy artificial intelligence (AI) systems need to manage the associated risks—for economic, legal, and ethical reasons. However, it is not always clear who is responsible for AI risk management.

This paper proposes an evaluation-based coordination scheme for situations in which frontier AI developers discover that their models have certain dangerous capabilities.

We evaluate the risks and benefits of open-sourcing, as well as alternative methods for pursuing open-source objectives.

There are increasing concerns that AGI would pose catastrophic risks. In light of this, AGI companies need to drastically improve their risk management practices. This paper reviews popular risk assessment techniques...

We welcome the opportunity to respond to the OSTP Request for Information on National Priorities for Artificial Intelligence and look forward to future opportunities to provide additional input. We offer the following...

We welcome the opportunity to respond to the NTIA’s AI Accountability Policy Request for Comment and look forward to future opportunities to provide additional input. We offer the following...

A number of leading AI companies, including OpenAI, Google DeepMind, andAnthropic, have the stated goal of building artificial general intelligence (AGI)—AI systems that achieve or exceed human performance...

Organizations that develop and deploy artificial intelligence (AI) systems need to take measures to reduce the associated risks. In this paper, we examine how AI companies could design an AI ethics board in a way that reduces...

The proposed EU AI Act is the first comprehensive attempt to regulate AI in a major jurisdiction. This article analyses Article 9, the key risk management provision in the AI Act. It gives an overview of the regulatory...

This report gives comments on the Initial Draft of the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF). The key recommendations are to put more emphasis on low-probability, high-impact risks, especially catastrophic risks to...